Attorney Karl Heideck has taken his time to write about the recently enacted law in Philadelphia that address the issues of workers’ salary history. In one of his articles, he has detailed the challenges that proponents of the law underwent before the legislation could finally become law. The salary law prohibits employer in the Philadelphia from asking potential employees about their past salaries. This legislation was announced in January of 2017 and was made Philadelphia the first municipality in the United States to pass a law that prevents employers from knowing the past salaried of new employees before they hire them.
The salary law was not well received by all the stakeholders in the municipality. It generated a lot of controversy with employers seeing it as a measure to curtail, their right to know more information about the people they are likely to employ. It seemed like the authority wanted to limit of information that they would know regarding potential new employees. Those who were on the supportive side, especially the workers’ unions advocates were pleased with the law as it created a level playing ground for all the workers in the municipality. The law would create transparency in the process of hiring new employees in the city. The law was particularly helpful to the marginalized communities that had been undermined when seeking for job opportunities.
According to attorney Karl Heideck, the law was beneficial to the municipality because it would eliminate the pay gap that existed between male and females in the municipality. The issue of gender gap in the United States has been around for many years with men getting better salaries than women for the same job description. This situation has been undermining women in the state since whenever they went to seek for new jobs, potential employers were only willing to add a certain amount on top of what they were earning in their previous jobs. This is a tradition that would extend the discrimination that already existed in places of work. A man would always end up with a higher salary than a woman working at the same level.
About Karl Heideck
Karl Heideck is a prominent attorney in Philadelphia. Karl Heideck graduated from the James E. Beasley School of law in 2009. Ever since he has been part of the legal developments that are happening in Philadelphia. Karl Heideck is known for being an author of articles in various blog posts. He also writes scholarly articles meant for educating the people about changes and developments in the commercial law field.
To know more visit @: karlheideck.wordpress.com/about/
Attorney Karld Heideck has made the decision to help children in the state of Pennsylvania. He is doing this by fighting for children who cannot speak for themselves or do not have the proper knowledge to speak for themselves. Karl Heideck is fighting for a new seat belt law to be put in place for those 12 and under and front passenger drivers.
The first group of children Attorney Karl Heideck is fighting for are infants to age 3. As this law is on the brink of passing, children ages 0-3 must be in a car seat at all times, and the car seat must be faced towards the rear window. This part of the law came about after trauma specialists conducted research which showed children who were faced towards the rear window have a better chance of surviving a car accident.
The next group of children Attorney Karl Heideck is fighting for are those age 4 to 6. Children ages 4-6 must be in a car seat at all times, and the car seat must be attached to a secure base. The addition this law making is secure base. A secure base was not always necessary. However, research experts have found that the secure base keeps the car seat and the child stable during car accidents.
An additional group of children Attorney Karl Heideck is helping are those ranging from 7-12. Once this law is in effect, children 7-11 will not be allowed to sit in the front passenger seat. They must also be securely buckled in the back seat. Additionally, if they do not meet proper weight requirements, they will have to be placed in a car seat.
Children who are 12 will be allowed to sit in the front passenger seat, but they must be securely strapped at all times. Karl Heideck has made the state of Pennsylvania take a long look at their seat belt laws, especially since car accidents are the main cause of death of children in Pennsylvania.
Karl Heideck has always had a heart for children in Pennsylvania. After graduating from Bealey Law School in Philadelphia, Attorney Heideck took action against organizations promoting unhealthy environments for children. These included stores, day care centers, and more. Every facility was forced to rework the way they approach customer safety.
Attorney Karl Heideck is also an established author with more than 5 different blogs a week. He was a proud English major before a proud law student.
Read More: www.facebook.com/karl.heideck
One of the reasons 2008 saw such a massive financial crisis has to do with the right people in the right place refraining from doing the right thing. There are a lot of reasons why that can happen. Job security is often the most prominent. People who could blow the whistle on superiors who are willingly engaged in underhanded, exploitative conduct that threatens the United States economy–and don’t–are usually in high positions of power. In an organization conducting underhanded business, the only people in a position to know what’s going on thoroughly enough to inform the proper authorities are usually risking their career. Prior 2008, there weren’t any existing legal protections that would keep such an individual from losing their job. In 2010, Congress passed a piece of legislation called the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and this definitely does something to help insure the whistleblower.
First and foremost, under Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers retain employment. Employers are legally restricted from taking recriminatory action against those who’ve alerted the SEC of underhanded financial practices. Secondly, incentives are available. In specific, whistleblowers become entitled to between ten and thirty percent of all collections pertaining to sanctions over a million dollars. Additional sanction discovery can result in additional incentive payment.
The only provision that Dodd-Frank can’t provide is that of anonymity in whistleblowing. For this necessity, Labaton Sucharow steps up to the plate.
Labaton Sucharow is the first Whistleblower Protection Practice. This organization began very soon after the 2010 Congress enactment of Dodd-Frank, and has a team of attorneys led by Jordan A. Thomas, the man who is most responsible for Dodd-Frank in the first place. Thomas used to work for the SEC, and during his time there wrote the legislation which became Dodd-Frank. Now he helps clients blow the whistle, maximize their available incentives, and remain anonymous if they so desire. Anonymity is the best way to curtail unwanted reputation declination, though some whistleblowers don’t seek it. http://www.secwhistlebloweradvocate.com/
Additionally, at Labaton Sucharow all initial consultations are entirely free. These can also remain anonymous if clients prefer, though Sucharow advises that the identity of a client be given to those who may potentially represent his or her interests in court.
There’s no way to stop greed, but there is a way to penalize it, restrict it, and keep it from dominating the country until the walls fall in. Dodd-Frank and Labaton Sucharow are at least one component striving to keep the country together.